Supporting biomedical research and evaluation: bibliometrics for information specialists

Main Article Content

Alicia Fátima Gómez

Abstract

Supporting research is one of the most important tasks for biomedical librarians and information specialists. This support can be offered in several ways. Libraries are responsible for acess to information, covered by the more traditional activities as Resources Purchases and Subscriptions Management, Document Supply and Interlibrary Loan Services, or Reference Service. Moreover, Libraries can assist researchers on their needs related to the assessment and evaluation of their scientific research.The aim of the EAHIL workshop session on Bibliometrics was to introduce biomedical librarians to the fundamentals of this discipline and to provide them with tools, techniques and methodologies on this subject in order to improve their services.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Supporting biomedical research and evaluation: bibliometrics for information specialists. J Eur Assoc Health Info Libr [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 11 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];11(3). Available from: https://ojs.eahil.eu/JEAHIL/article/view/62
Section
Workshop Report

How to Cite

1.
Supporting biomedical research and evaluation: bibliometrics for information specialists. J Eur Assoc Health Info Libr [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 11 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];11(3). Available from: https://ojs.eahil.eu/JEAHIL/article/view/62

References

Björneborn L, Ingwersen P. Toward a basic

framework for webometrics. Journal of the

American Society for Information Science and

Technology. 2004;55(14):1216-27.

doi: 10.1002/asi.20077

Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or

bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation.

;25(4):348-9.

Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A New

Dimension in Documentation through

Association of Ideas. Science.

;122(3159):108-11.

doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108.

Franceschet M. Ten good reasons to use the

Eigenfactorâ„¢ metrics. Information Processing &

Management. 2010;46(5):555-8.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.001.

Garfield E. The history and meaning of the

journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90-3.

doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90.

Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index.

Scientometrics. 2006;69(1):131-52.

doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.

Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, de Rijcke S,

Rafols I. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for

research metrics. Nature. 2015;520(7548):429-

doi: 10.1038/520429a. PubMed PMID: