Reducing systematic review workload using text mining: opportunities and pitfalls

Main Article Content

Claire Stansfield

Abstract

This EAHIL workshop focussed on three applications of text mining to assist with screening citations for systematic reviews, and encouraged participants to discuss issues affecting their adoption. This paper outlines these applications and summarises the factors raised by participants in relation to their uptake. Key aspects to uptake include having an accepted advantage over existing approaches, coupled with training and user support.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Stansfield C. Reducing systematic review workload using text mining: opportunities and pitfalls. J Eur Assoc Health Info Libr [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 11 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];11(3). Available from: https://ojs.eahil.eu/JEAHIL/article/view/53
Section
Workshop Report

References

O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa

M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study

identification in systematic reviews: a systematic

review of current approaches. Systematic

Reviews. 2015;4:5. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5

Project Transform [internet] 2015 [cited 2015 Jun

http://community.cochrane.org/transform

Thomas JM. Diffusion of innovation in systematic

review methodology: Why is study selection not

yet assisted by automation? OA Evidence-Based

Medicine. 2013 Oct;1(2):12.

Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New

York, NY: Free Press; 2003.