An overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: from expert search to project manager

Main Article Content

Margaret J. Foster

Abstract

This article will cover the content provided in two workshops offered at the EAHIL+ICAHIS+ICLC 2015 in Edinburgh, Scotland: Introduction to systematic reviews and the role of the librarian and Project and data management in systematic reviews.Throughout the process of conducting the review, a librarians role can vary from a search expert to project leader depending on the needs of the researchers. This paper will cover all of the steps of the review, describing potential roles for librarians, as well as project and/or data management issues to consider. In addition, negotiating authorship and defining a systematic review service will be discussed.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Foster MJ. An overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: from expert search to project manager. J Eur Assoc Health Info Libr [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 11 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];11(3). Available from: https://ojs.eahil.eu/JEAHIL/article/view/52
Section
Workshop Report

References

Rethlefsen ML, Murad MH, Livingston EH.

Engaging medical librarians to improve the

quality of review articles. JAMA. 2014 Sep

;312(10):999-1000.

Dudden RF, Protzko SL. The systematic review

team: contributions of the health sciences

librarian. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(3):301-15.

McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews

need systematic searchers. J Med Libr Assoc.

Jan;93(1):74-80.

Piehl JH, Green S, Silagy C. Training

practitioners in preparing systematic reviews: a

cross-sectional survey of participants in the

Australasian Cochrane Centre training program.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun 2;2(1):11.

Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic

approaches to a successful literature review. Los

Angeles; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage; 2012.

Robinson KA, Whitlock EP, Oneil ME, Anderson

JK, Hartling L, Dryden DM, et al. Integration of

existing systematic reviews into new reviews:

identification of guidance needs. Syst Rev. 2014

Jun 23;3:60,4053-3-60.

Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, Straus S,

Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time

for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4.

Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for

systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane

Collaboration; 2011. Report No.: 5.1.0.

Tovey D. Methodological Expectations of

Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR).

Cochrane Collaboration; 2013. Report No.: 2.3.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C,

Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA

statement for reporting systematic reviews and

meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare

interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ.

Jul 21;339:b2700.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Lefebvre C, Moher

D, Grimshaw J. PRESS: Peer Review of

Electronic Search Strategies. Ottawa: Canadian

Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health;

Parkes J, Hyde C, Deeks J, Milne R. Teaching

critical appraisal skills in health care settings.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

;(3)(3):CD001270.

Li T, Vedula SS, Hadar N, Parkin C, Lau J,

Dickersin K. Innovations in data collection,

management, and archiving for systematic

reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb

;162(4):287-94.

Elamin MB, Flynn DN, Bassler D, Briel M,

Alonso-Coello P, Karanicolas PJ, et al. Choice of

data extraction tools for systematic reviews

depends on resources and review complexity. J

Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):506-10.

Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors

[Internet].; 2015 [cited 8/5/2015]. Available

from:

http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#two.