Epistemonikos and KSR Evidence usability for SBU Evidence maps
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents an evaluation of the two databases Epistemonikos and KSR Evidence, in the context of conducting evidence maps at the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU). Methods: 36 systematic reviews included in published SBU Evidence Maps were used as a gold standard records (GSR). Title searches, as well as subject searches, were performed. Result: Title searches showed that Epistemonikos covers 97% of the GSR, and KSR Evidence covers 94%. Structured subject searches retrieved a part of the references, 58% from KSR Evidence and 48% from Epistemonikos. Conclusion: Epistemonikos and KSR Evidence are valuable resources for identifying systematic reviews, but not sufficient to replace any of the databases usually used for SBUs Evidence Maps.
Mesh: Databases, Bibliographic; Information Storage and Retrieval; Review Literature as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine
Mesh: Databases, Bibliographic; Information Storage and Retrieval; Review Literature as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Epistemonikos and KSR Evidence: usability for SBU Evidence maps. J Eur Assoc Health Info Libr [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 16 [cited 2024 Oct. 30];17(1):18-22. Available from: https://ojs.eahil.eu/JEAHIL/article/view/451
Issue
Section
Feature Articles
JEAHIL is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information on Open Access, copyright and permissions.
How to Cite
1.
Epistemonikos and KSR Evidence: usability for SBU Evidence maps. J Eur Assoc Health Info Libr [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 16 [cited 2024 Oct. 30];17(1):18-22. Available from: https://ojs.eahil.eu/JEAHIL/article/view/451