An overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: from expert search to project manager

  • Margaret J. Foster Medical Sciences Library, Texas A&M University, MS 4462, College Station, Texas, USA

Abstract


This article will cover the content provided in two workshops offered at the EAHIL+ICAHIS+ICLC 2015 in Edinburgh, Scotland: Introduction to systematic reviews and the role of the librarian and Project and data management in systematic reviews.Throughout the process of conducting the review, a librarians role can vary from a search expert to project leader depending on the needs of the researchers. This paper will cover all of the steps of the review, describing potential roles for librarians, as well as project and/or data management issues to consider. In addition, negotiating authorship and defining a systematic review service will be discussed.

References

1. Rethlefsen ML, Murad MH, Livingston EH.
Engaging medical librarians to improve the
quality of review articles. JAMA. 2014 Sep
10;312(10):999-1000.

2. Dudden RF, Protzko SL. The systematic review
team: contributions of the health sciences
librarian. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(3):301-15.

3. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews
need systematic searchers. J Med Libr Assoc.
2005 Jan;93(1):74-80.

4. Piehl JH, Green S, Silagy C. Training
practitioners in preparing systematic reviews: a
cross-sectional survey of participants in the
Australasian Cochrane Centre training program.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun 2;2(1):11.

5. Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic
approaches to a successful literature review. Los
Angeles; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage; 2012.

6. Robinson KA, Whitlock EP, Oneil ME, Anderson
JK, Hartling L, Dryden DM, et al. Integration of
existing systematic reviews into new reviews:
identification of guidance needs. Syst Rev. 2014
Jun 23;3:60,4053-3-60.

7. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, Straus S,
Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time
for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4.

8. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for
systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane
Collaboration; 2011. Report No.: 5.1.0.

9. Tovey D. Methodological Expectations of
Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR).
Cochrane Collaboration; 2013. Report No.: 2.3.

10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C,
Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA
statement for reporting systematic reviews and
meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare
interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ.
2009 Jul 21;339:b2700.

11. Sampson M, McGowan J, Lefebvre C, Moher
D, Grimshaw J. PRESS: Peer Review of
Electronic Search Strategies. Ottawa: Canadian
Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health;
2008.

12. Parkes J, Hyde C, Deeks J, Milne R. Teaching
critical appraisal skills in health care settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2001;(3)(3):CD001270.

13. Li T, Vedula SS, Hadar N, Parkin C, Lau J,
Dickersin K. Innovations in data collection,
management, and archiving for systematic
reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb
17;162(4):287-94.

14. Elamin MB, Flynn DN, Bassler D, Briel M,
Alonso-Coello P, Karanicolas PJ, et al. Choice of
data extraction tools for systematic reviews
depends on resources and review complexity. J
Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):506-10.

15. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors
[Internet].; 2015 [cited 8/5/2015]. Available
from:
http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#two.
Published
2016-03-11
How to Cite
1.
Foster M. An overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: from expert search to project manager. JEAHIL [Internet]. 11Mar.2016 [cited 18Oct.2019];11(3). Available from: http://ojs.eahil.eu/ojs/index.php/JEAHIL/article/view/52
Section
Workshop Report